Vlogging Youtubers
Paul & Adam are "The Fish Box Men"! We have a wealth of experience in the packaging and seafood industries.
Our vlog was created to show you what we do, why we do it and what we can offer you. We spend our time visiting mainly seafood processing clients across Europe, and taking a look at how our packaging benefits their business.
Take a look at some of our films where we speak with the business owners and get an insight into what their company is all about.
Our YouTube channel is still very young, so please keep checking back as we plan to upload new content every month!
Enjoy.
Our vlog was created to show you what we do, why we do it and what we can offer you. We spend our time visiting mainly seafood processing clients across Europe, and taking a look at how our packaging benefits their business.
Take a look at some of our films where we speak with the business owners and get an insight into what their company is all about.
Our YouTube channel is still very young, so please keep checking back as we plan to upload new content every month!
Enjoy.
Dennis Crooks is a seafood wholesaler based in Whitby, England.
Keltic Seafare is a Scottish supplier of premium live shellfish to the finest restaurants in London and Paris.
|
Jacob Kongsbak Lassen is a seafood wholesaler based in Copenhagen, Denmark.
|
Watch how our 100% recyclable seafood boxes are produced at our state of the art factory.
|
D.R Collin is an international exporter of Scottish shellfish.
|
Alternatives to polystyrene fish packaging
Polystyrene, a synthetic aromatic polymer made from the monomer styrene, is a widely used material in various industries due to its lightweight, insulating properties, and low cost. However, its use in seafood packaging raises significant environmental, health, and economic concerns, making it a particularly poor choice for this application. This essay explores why polystyrene is an unsuitable material for seafood packaging, focusing on its environmental impact, potential health risks, and economic drawbacks.
Environmental Impact
Non-Biodegradability
One of the most significant issues with polystyrene is its non-biodegradable nature. Polystyrene can take hundreds to thousands of years to break down in the environment. This longevity means that every piece of polystyrene ever produced still exists in some form, contributing to long-term environmental pollution. When used for seafood packaging, which is often discarded after a single use, polystyrene quickly accumulates in landfills and natural habitats, causing substantial harm to ecosystems.
Marine Pollution
A considerable amount of discarded polystyrene ends up in the oceans, where it poses a severe threat to marine life. Polystyrene debris is often mistaken for food by marine animals, leading to ingestion that can cause blockages, malnutrition, and death. Additionally, polystyrene breaks down into small particles known as microplastics, which are easily ingested by a wide range of marine organisms. These microplastics can enter the food chain, potentially affecting human health as well.
Chemical Leaching
Polystyrene contains various chemical additives to enhance its properties. When exposed to environmental conditions such as sunlight, water, and heat, these chemicals can leach out into the environment. Styrene monomers, residual chemicals from the production process, are particularly concerning. They are known to be toxic and can cause adverse effects on aquatic organisms and ecosystems.
Health Risks
Chemical Exposure
Polystyrene is composed of styrene, a substance classified as a possible human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). When used for seafood packaging, especially if the packaging is exposed to heat or oily substances, there is a risk of styrene and other harmful chemicals leaching into the food. Consuming food contaminated with these chemicals can pose significant health risks, including hormonal disruptions, developmental issues, and increased cancer risk.
Contaminant Absorption
Polystyrene is also known to absorb and retain environmental contaminants such as pesticides and heavy metals. When used in packaging for seafood, particularly if the seafood is fatty, these contaminants can be transferred to the food. This secondary contamination can add to the health risks associated with polystyrene packaging.
Economic Drawbacks
Waste Management Costs
The disposal of polystyrene is a major economic burden. Due to its lightweight nature, polystyrene occupies a significant volume in landfills, contributing to the rapid filling of waste disposal sites. Municipalities face high costs in managing polystyrene waste, including collection, transportation, and landfill maintenance. Additionally, because polystyrene is not widely accepted in recycling programs, the opportunities for recycling and reducing waste are limited.
Cleanup Expenses
Polystyrene pollution in natural environments, particularly in coastal and marine areas, incurs substantial cleanup costs. Governments and organizations spend significant resources on removing polystyrene debris from beaches, waterways, and urban areas. These cleanup efforts are essential to mitigate environmental damage but represent a continual economic strain.
Impact on Fisheries and Tourism
Polystyrene pollution negatively impacts fisheries and tourism, critical sectors for many coastal economies. Polluted waters and beaches deter tourists, leading to decreased revenue for local businesses. Moreover, the presence of polystyrene in marine environments can harm fish populations and other seafood sources, affecting the livelihoods of those who depend on fishing.
Alternatives to Polystyrene
Given the significant drawbacks of polystyrene, it is crucial to consider alternative materials for seafood packaging. Sustainable options include:
100% Recyclable Packaging
Coolseal offers the best of most worlds. It is sustainably produced, it reduces the carbon footprint, it is 100% recyclable. It can be used for packing wet product, such as fresh fish with ice, and does not lose its strength or integrity. We recommend it to all seafood processors and wholesalers.
Biodegradable Plastics
Biodegradable plastics, made from renewable resources such as corn starch or sugarcane, offer a more environmentally friendly alternative. These materials break down more rapidly in the environment, reducing long-term pollution and the burden on waste management systems.
Paper-Based Packaging
Paper-based packaging, often coated with a biodegradable waterproof layer, provides a sustainable and practical solution. It is compostable, recyclable, and has a significantly lower environmental impact compared to polystyrene.
Reusable Packaging
Implementing reusable packaging systems can drastically reduce waste. Containers made from durable materials like stainless steel, glass, or certain plastics can be cleaned and reused multiple times, minimising the reliance on single-use packaging.
Conclusion
While polystyrene offers certain practical benefits for seafood packaging, its environmental, health, and economic costs far outweigh these advantages. Its persistence in the environment, potential to harm marine and human life, and substantial economic burden make it a poor choice for this application. Transitioning to more sustainable packaging options, such as easily recyclable plastics, biodegradable plastics, paper-based materials, and reusable containers, is essential to protect our ecosystems, health, and economies. By prioritizing environmentally friendly materials, we can move towards a more sustainable and responsible approach to seafood packaging.
Environmental Impact
Non-Biodegradability
One of the most significant issues with polystyrene is its non-biodegradable nature. Polystyrene can take hundreds to thousands of years to break down in the environment. This longevity means that every piece of polystyrene ever produced still exists in some form, contributing to long-term environmental pollution. When used for seafood packaging, which is often discarded after a single use, polystyrene quickly accumulates in landfills and natural habitats, causing substantial harm to ecosystems.
Marine Pollution
A considerable amount of discarded polystyrene ends up in the oceans, where it poses a severe threat to marine life. Polystyrene debris is often mistaken for food by marine animals, leading to ingestion that can cause blockages, malnutrition, and death. Additionally, polystyrene breaks down into small particles known as microplastics, which are easily ingested by a wide range of marine organisms. These microplastics can enter the food chain, potentially affecting human health as well.
Chemical Leaching
Polystyrene contains various chemical additives to enhance its properties. When exposed to environmental conditions such as sunlight, water, and heat, these chemicals can leach out into the environment. Styrene monomers, residual chemicals from the production process, are particularly concerning. They are known to be toxic and can cause adverse effects on aquatic organisms and ecosystems.
Health Risks
Chemical Exposure
Polystyrene is composed of styrene, a substance classified as a possible human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). When used for seafood packaging, especially if the packaging is exposed to heat or oily substances, there is a risk of styrene and other harmful chemicals leaching into the food. Consuming food contaminated with these chemicals can pose significant health risks, including hormonal disruptions, developmental issues, and increased cancer risk.
Contaminant Absorption
Polystyrene is also known to absorb and retain environmental contaminants such as pesticides and heavy metals. When used in packaging for seafood, particularly if the seafood is fatty, these contaminants can be transferred to the food. This secondary contamination can add to the health risks associated with polystyrene packaging.
Economic Drawbacks
Waste Management Costs
The disposal of polystyrene is a major economic burden. Due to its lightweight nature, polystyrene occupies a significant volume in landfills, contributing to the rapid filling of waste disposal sites. Municipalities face high costs in managing polystyrene waste, including collection, transportation, and landfill maintenance. Additionally, because polystyrene is not widely accepted in recycling programs, the opportunities for recycling and reducing waste are limited.
Cleanup Expenses
Polystyrene pollution in natural environments, particularly in coastal and marine areas, incurs substantial cleanup costs. Governments and organizations spend significant resources on removing polystyrene debris from beaches, waterways, and urban areas. These cleanup efforts are essential to mitigate environmental damage but represent a continual economic strain.
Impact on Fisheries and Tourism
Polystyrene pollution negatively impacts fisheries and tourism, critical sectors for many coastal economies. Polluted waters and beaches deter tourists, leading to decreased revenue for local businesses. Moreover, the presence of polystyrene in marine environments can harm fish populations and other seafood sources, affecting the livelihoods of those who depend on fishing.
Alternatives to Polystyrene
Given the significant drawbacks of polystyrene, it is crucial to consider alternative materials for seafood packaging. Sustainable options include:
100% Recyclable Packaging
Coolseal offers the best of most worlds. It is sustainably produced, it reduces the carbon footprint, it is 100% recyclable. It can be used for packing wet product, such as fresh fish with ice, and does not lose its strength or integrity. We recommend it to all seafood processors and wholesalers.
Biodegradable Plastics
Biodegradable plastics, made from renewable resources such as corn starch or sugarcane, offer a more environmentally friendly alternative. These materials break down more rapidly in the environment, reducing long-term pollution and the burden on waste management systems.
Paper-Based Packaging
Paper-based packaging, often coated with a biodegradable waterproof layer, provides a sustainable and practical solution. It is compostable, recyclable, and has a significantly lower environmental impact compared to polystyrene.
Reusable Packaging
Implementing reusable packaging systems can drastically reduce waste. Containers made from durable materials like stainless steel, glass, or certain plastics can be cleaned and reused multiple times, minimising the reliance on single-use packaging.
Conclusion
While polystyrene offers certain practical benefits for seafood packaging, its environmental, health, and economic costs far outweigh these advantages. Its persistence in the environment, potential to harm marine and human life, and substantial economic burden make it a poor choice for this application. Transitioning to more sustainable packaging options, such as easily recyclable plastics, biodegradable plastics, paper-based materials, and reusable containers, is essential to protect our ecosystems, health, and economies. By prioritizing environmentally friendly materials, we can move towards a more sustainable and responsible approach to seafood packaging.